Tower Concept - Noida, India |
At first blush building the
tower of Babel must have seemed like a noble undertaking. According
to the account in Genesis, the people of Babel, 'of one language and
few words', decided to build a tower and city,
'whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we
be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth'.
It's
interesting to me that, at least as portrayed in the language of King
James, these people knew what was about to happen, but did not
realize that what they were about to do would be the cause of it.
Instead they thought the tower and the city would cement them in both
history and geography. Not the first time that men have misread the
portents of their ambitions, nor the last.
In other accounts—and there
are more than a few—the purpose of the tower was so that the
builders might be able to commune directly with God. Apparently they
had a clearer idea than we do today of where exactly God lived and
how to reach him. What they didn't understand was how little, even
then, God wanted to have to do with an over-reaching humankind.
By nearly all accounts, the
Tower was huge. Not the replica built by Nebuchednazer in Babylon in
the 6th century B.C. That little exercise in borrowing
thunder from the past measured only 300 feet in height. The real
deal, the first Tower of Babel, the one frequently attributed to
Nimrod, was 5,433 cubits plus 2 palms tall 13 stades wide and 30
stades long according to the Book of Jubilees.
Translating these measurements
into units we are more familiar with today: 9,508.25 feet in height,
7,800 feet in width, and 18,000 feet in length. By comparison, the
current tallest structure in the world, the puny Burj Khalifa in
Dubai, stands only 2,716.5 feet high, less than a third of Babel's
awesome height and the merest sliver of its width and breadth.
A more modest estimate for the
Tower in the Third Apocalypse of Baruch puts it at 463 cubits
or 810 feet. This would have made it the tallest structure in the
world up until the Eiffel tower was completed in 1889. Interestingly,
the estimate in the Book of Jubilees
is not the most ambitious, for 14th century
traveler John Mandeville reported that local residents claimed the
Tower had been 8 miles in height. This would make it some 13,000 feet
taller than Mount Everest. The Sherpa has not been born that could
carry a white mountaineer and all his gear this high. Presumably,
when your aim is to talk directly to God, oxygen is not that big an
issue.
In the end all the effort came
to naught. Again according to the account in Genesis: 'And
the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one
language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be
restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us
go down, and there confound their language, that they may not
understand one another's speech. So the Lord scattered them abroad
from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to
build the city.'
Now I don't presume to know why
God objected to the tower. It may be that it was so large that He
thought it would throw the earth out of orbit and undo a lot of His
handiwork. He already had a lot invested in the dodo bird, the
passenger pigeon, the North African elephant, and the Bali tiger, not
the least of which was getting them paired up and safely stowed on
Noah's Arc. Surely he didn't want them to become extinct because of
some misguided land development scheme authored by the movers and
shakers of the day.
It may be that he didn't want a
bunch of social climbers showing up unannounced and uninvited for
dinner. Or it may be, as the narrative seems to suggest, that He
didn't want them to succeed to the point where they thought they
could undertake other even more ambitious projects. Whatever the
reason for His objection, the solution was simple enough—confound
their speech so they couldn't understand one another. The people were
scattered. The project was abandoned. The problem persists to this
day.
Another word for a stepped
tower is ziggurat. Ziggurats were common in ancient Mesopotamia. The Ziggurat of Babel is a
good name for the infamous tower, especially for those
of us whose speech has been confounded by a watchful God. If you drop 'ziggurat' into casual conversations, no one will know what the hell you are talking about. Just, it would seem, as God intended.
I think the InterWeb is a good
modern digital analog of the Ziggurat of Babel. For one thing,
it is huge. I don't think anyone knows exactly how big it is. It
grows every day. If you took all the hardware that it takes to run
the InterWeb—servers, cables, disk drives, storage devices, PCs,
tablets and mobile devices from all over the world—and piled them
up all in one place, that stack would probably reach near to heaven.
I don't think that if we climbed up that stack though, we would be
able to talk to God.
I do think that some people
believed, as the InterWeb developed and grew, that it would make us
like God in many ways. The instant and universal availability of
knowledge and ideas would foster sharing and collaborations such that
'now
nothing will be restrained from [us], which [we] have imagined to
do'.
There is certainly a lot of
promise in the InterWeb, and, at first blush, it would seem a noble
enterprise. What no one seems to have reckoned with, however, is the
instant and universal availability of bad information—the modern
digital analog of confounded speech. Hardly anyone knows what the
hell they are talking about anymore, and every day it gets harder and
harder to winnow the chaff.
This is why it is possible for
some yahoo to assert with certainty that 4 million innocent Iraqis
died at the hands of U.S. Troops as a direct result of the evil
machinations of President George W. Bush. The same yahoo believes
that the Pope, Jesus, and the Tea Party were somehow complicit in
this, and there is nothing about the InterWeb to prevent him tweeting
this drivel out into the ether where it can be read by more yahoos
who will believe it for no better reason than that they want to.
Snopes, no matter how well intended, cannot keep up with the sheer
volume of dreck.
Morons are writing our history.
They are baking it into mud bricks and cementing it together with
pitch slime. We will be well and truly confounded and likely
scattered amongst the stars, the Earth no longer being sufficient to
contain our ambitions.
This post is so very interesting but I think it's not as bleak as you imagine. Sure, there are tons of people out there spreading false history, but I would argue the Internet also serves as a place where people can go to learn the truth, or at least other peoples' opinion. And even 100 years ago that was an option that you didn't have, if your neighbor or cousin or preacher was insisting something was true!
ReplyDeleteYou are right of course, Megan. I find a lot of useful stuff online, and nothing's as bleak as I make it out to be when I am trying to make a point. On the other hand we humans have always had a penchant for accepting at face value anything that reinforces our preconceptions. The Internet has magnified this proclivity's potential for harm. I think the remarkable lack of civil discourse in politics is one of the natural results.
ReplyDelete