Let's talk about the federal deficit. Everybody seems to agree that it is a bugaboo, but no one is willing to give up anything to
make it go away. Barack Obama said we need to do something about it
back in 2006 while George W. Bush was spending us into oblivion. Now
that Obama is president the deficit has soared to unprecedented
heights...at least if you believe this graphic that has been
circulating the Net:
My niece, who ought to know better, shard this on Facebook. The innocent are being led astray by blatant disregard for the truth. |
The anti-Obama forces love this because it paints a picture of our
president as not only a profligate spender but one who is unnaturally
and, as the picture seems to evidence, smugly happy about it. Those
more amenable to the President are not that happy with it because,
among other things, it's not very accurate. The math doesn't work, and it leaves a lot of useful information on the editing room floor.
The amount of federal public debt handed over to the new
administration at the end of George W. Bush's term was $10.7
Trillion. Of that, $6.3 Trillion was owed to the public and $4.4
Trillion was owed to other U.S. government agencies. The total public
debt increased under the Bush administration from $5.7 Trillion in
2001 to $10.7 Trillion in December of 2008. As of February of this
year (2012) the total public debt stood at $15.5 Trillion, an
increase, so far, of $4.8 Trillion.
The Office of Management and the Budget (OMB) estimates that by the
end of fiscal 2012 the gross federal debt will stand at $16.3
Trillion. This represents an increase of $5.6 Trillion, not the $6.5
Trillion depicted in the graphic.
The other problem, of course, is that if you're going to hold Obama
responsible for running up the deficit with extravagant spending,
then he better have bought something truly ridiculous. Here's a nice
graph of where all that new deficit came from since Obama took
office:
So except for Tarp, the bailouts, and the stimulus spending, which
together total about $1.5 Trillion, none of the deficit spending was
initiated by Barack Obama. It all came from programs, policies, and
two wars in place before he took office.
Here's another telling chart, this one from the July 23, 2011 edition
of the New York Times Sunday Review, and based
on data from the Congressional Budget Office and the Center on Budget
and Policy Priorities. It is 'intellectual' as opposed to 'partisan.'
That is, it does not spin blame, but rather pins spending to the
origin of the policies that drive it.
To me this shows the utter dishonesty of Republicans who cry about
the deficits while refusing to acknowledge that the single most
influential driver of deficit spending that has occurred during
Obama's presidency is the Bush tax cuts. Not only do they refuse to
acknowledge this indisputable fact, they want to add to the problem
with even deeper tax cuts.
It doesn't make any sense to me that Mitt Romney and the Republicans
hope to make their narrative stick, but stick it does in spite of the
fact that it is a BALD-FACED-LIE. They are no longer accountable to
the facts. Apparently they don't have to be.
They know hardly anyone will bother to check on the truthfulness of their
assertions. There are too many facts to check, and it's too hard to
separate the truth from the fiction. All a politician need do is keep
repeating the story he wants to tell. When he's said it often enough
it becomes true enough for the faithful who, after all, only believe
what they want to believe.
Does anybody besides me long for the days when you could call a guy a
liar, lay out the facts, and he'd be embarrassed by the dishonesty?
Now the facts are just words streaming in the ether without effect or
import.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are always welcome. Tell me what you like and what you don't. Information, encouragement, criticism--I don't care. A day where I don't learn something new is a day lost to me.